• Governor Hope Uzodimma’s public statements distancing IPOB from violent attacks in Imo State introduce a serious contradiction that could undermine the prosecution’s case against Nnamdi Kanu. Here’s how:

    1. Contradiction in Government Narrative

    - Uzodimma’s statement: In multiple televised interviews and public addresses, Uzodimma stated that the killings and destruction in Imo were not carried out by IPOB but by political opponents and “imported” actors.
    - Impact on trial: This directly contradicts the DSS and prosecution’s claim that Kanu, as IPOB leader, directed these attacks. If the state’s own governor exonerates IPOB, it weakens the credibility of the federal case.

    2. Legal Implications for Kanu’s Trial

    - Undermines causation: The prosecution must prove that Kanu’s words or directives directly led to specific crimes. If the governor says IPOB wasn’t responsible, it casts doubt on whether Kanu’s alleged broadcasts caused the violence.
    - Supports defence argument: Kanu’s team can use Uzodimma’s statements to argue that the charges are politically motivated or based on misattribution.
    - Weakens audio evidence: Even if Kanu confirmed certain recordings, the prosecution must still prove that those recordings led to specific criminal acts by identifiable individuals acting under his command.

    3. Challenges in Linking Kanu to “Unknown Gunmen”

    To prove that “unknown gunmen” acted on Kanu’s orders, the government must establish:

    - Clear chain of command: Evidence that Kanu gave specific instructions to identifiable individuals who carried them out.
    - Temporal and causal link: That the attacks occurred shortly after and directly because of his broadcasts.
    - Witness testimony or confessions: From perpetrators stating they acted on Kanu’s orders; not just hearsay or assumptions.
    - Forensic or digital trail: Linking Kanu’s communications to the planning or execution of the attacks.

    Without this, the term “unknown gunmen” remains legally ambiguous and cannot be pinn
    Governor Hope Uzodimma’s public statements distancing IPOB from violent attacks in Imo State introduce a serious contradiction that could undermine the prosecution’s case against Nnamdi Kanu. Here’s how: 1. Contradiction in Government Narrative - Uzodimma’s statement: In multiple televised interviews and public addresses, Uzodimma stated that the killings and destruction in Imo were not carried out by IPOB but by political opponents and “imported” actors. - Impact on trial: This directly contradicts the DSS and prosecution’s claim that Kanu, as IPOB leader, directed these attacks. If the state’s own governor exonerates IPOB, it weakens the credibility of the federal case. 2. Legal Implications for Kanu’s Trial - Undermines causation: The prosecution must prove that Kanu’s words or directives directly led to specific crimes. If the governor says IPOB wasn’t responsible, it casts doubt on whether Kanu’s alleged broadcasts caused the violence. - Supports defence argument: Kanu’s team can use Uzodimma’s statements to argue that the charges are politically motivated or based on misattribution. - Weakens audio evidence: Even if Kanu confirmed certain recordings, the prosecution must still prove that those recordings led to specific criminal acts by identifiable individuals acting under his command. 3. Challenges in Linking Kanu to “Unknown Gunmen” To prove that “unknown gunmen” acted on Kanu’s orders, the government must establish: - Clear chain of command: Evidence that Kanu gave specific instructions to identifiable individuals who carried them out. - Temporal and causal link: That the attacks occurred shortly after and directly because of his broadcasts. - Witness testimony or confessions: From perpetrators stating they acted on Kanu’s orders; not just hearsay or assumptions. - Forensic or digital trail: Linking Kanu’s communications to the planning or execution of the attacks. Without this, the term “unknown gunmen” remains legally ambiguous and cannot be pinn
    0 Commentarios ·0 Acciones ·7 Views ·0 Vista previa
  • Boxing legend Mike Tyson has reconnected with his ancestral roots in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where he received a heartfelt welcome in Kinshasa.

    Thousands of fans and local leaders came together to celebrate the former world heavyweight champion’s return, honoring his deep ancestral connection to the DRC’s vibrant cultural heritage.
    Boxing legend Mike Tyson has reconnected with his ancestral roots in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where he received a heartfelt welcome in Kinshasa. Thousands of fans and local leaders came together to celebrate the former world heavyweight champion’s return, honoring his deep ancestral connection to the DRC’s vibrant cultural heritage.
    0 Commentarios ·0 Acciones ·19 Views ·0 Vista previa
  • Summary Critique of What Happened in Court on 23 October 2025

    What happened before Justice Omotosho was another proof that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is not being given justice but persecution.

    1. Ignoring the Appeal Court’s Discharge
    The Court of Appeal already discharged and acquitted Mazi Nnamdi Kanu in October 2022.
    The Supreme Court never set that discharge aside — it only said the case could be retried if the Government so wished.
    It did not order his continued detention.
    Therefore, keeping him locked up since then is a clear act of contempt against the appellate judgment.

    In law, a party in contempt is not entitled to be heard or benefit from the court until the contempt is purged.
    As stated in Hadkinson v. Hadkinson (1952) 2 All ER 567, “a person in contempt cannot be heard until he obeys the order.”
    The DSS cannot disobey the Court of Appeal’s order of release and at the same time ask another court to try him.

    2. Refusal to Hear Objection on Jurisdiction
    In court, Kanu boldly told Justice Omotosho:

    “I will not be tried under a repealed, dead law.”

    He was right.
    The Terrorism (Prevention Amendment) Act 2013 and CEMA 2004, under which he is being charged, were repealed by the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act 2022.
    A repealed law cannot support a valid trial.
    Yet, the judge refused to hear his objection on jurisdiction, saying it would be taken after the trial.
    That position turns the law upside down — a court must first decide if it has jurisdiction before taking any other step.
    Otherwise, everything done becomes a nullity.

    3. No Fair Hearing or Lawyer Access
    Kanu told the court that his meetings with his lawyers are monitored and recorded by the DSS, which destroys the confidentiality guaranteed by Section 36 of the Constitution.
    Instead of addressing this violation, the judge dismissed it, saying Kanu’s only fair hearing was to “call his witnesses.”
    That is not how the law defines fair hearing — it starts with free access to counsel and an unbiased court, not with forced participation in a sham process.

    4. Forged Medical Report
    Kanu also complained that the medical report presented by the DSS was forged.
    Instead of ordering an investigation, the judge said he would stand by the report because it was once accepted by his former lawyer, Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN.
    That statement means the court knowingly chose to rely on a forged document.
    No court should ever condone forgery — it offends both justice and the judicial oath.

    5. What It All Means
    The 23 October 2025 hearing showed a pattern of bias and deliberate injustice:

    The government remains in contempt but is still entertained.
    The judge refused to decide whether the law even allows the trial.
    The defendant’s right to counsel and fair hearing is trampled.
    A forged report is brushed aside.
    This is not a trial; it is persecution dressed up as procedure.

    Until the Government obeys the Court of Appeal order and releases Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, no court has moral or legal authority to continue this charade.

    You cannot break the law and then ask the law to protect you.



    #FreeMaziNnamdiKanuNow
    Summary Critique of What Happened in Court on 23 October 2025 What happened before Justice Omotosho was another proof that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is not being given justice but persecution. 1. Ignoring the Appeal Court’s Discharge The Court of Appeal already discharged and acquitted Mazi Nnamdi Kanu in October 2022. The Supreme Court never set that discharge aside — it only said the case could be retried if the Government so wished. It did not order his continued detention. Therefore, keeping him locked up since then is a clear act of contempt against the appellate judgment. In law, a party in contempt is not entitled to be heard or benefit from the court until the contempt is purged. As stated in Hadkinson v. Hadkinson (1952) 2 All ER 567, “a person in contempt cannot be heard until he obeys the order.” The DSS cannot disobey the Court of Appeal’s order of release and at the same time ask another court to try him. 2. Refusal to Hear Objection on Jurisdiction In court, Kanu boldly told Justice Omotosho: “I will not be tried under a repealed, dead law.” He was right. The Terrorism (Prevention Amendment) Act 2013 and CEMA 2004, under which he is being charged, were repealed by the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act 2022. A repealed law cannot support a valid trial. Yet, the judge refused to hear his objection on jurisdiction, saying it would be taken after the trial. That position turns the law upside down — a court must first decide if it has jurisdiction before taking any other step. Otherwise, everything done becomes a nullity. 3. No Fair Hearing or Lawyer Access Kanu told the court that his meetings with his lawyers are monitored and recorded by the DSS, which destroys the confidentiality guaranteed by Section 36 of the Constitution. Instead of addressing this violation, the judge dismissed it, saying Kanu’s only fair hearing was to “call his witnesses.” That is not how the law defines fair hearing — it starts with free access to counsel and an unbiased court, not with forced participation in a sham process. 4. Forged Medical Report Kanu also complained that the medical report presented by the DSS was forged. Instead of ordering an investigation, the judge said he would stand by the report because it was once accepted by his former lawyer, Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN. That statement means the court knowingly chose to rely on a forged document. No court should ever condone forgery — it offends both justice and the judicial oath. 5. What It All Means The 23 October 2025 hearing showed a pattern of bias and deliberate injustice: The government remains in contempt but is still entertained. The judge refused to decide whether the law even allows the trial. The defendant’s right to counsel and fair hearing is trampled. A forged report is brushed aside. This is not a trial; it is persecution dressed up as procedure. Until the Government obeys the Court of Appeal order and releases Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, no court has moral or legal authority to continue this charade. You cannot break the law and then ask the law to protect you. #FreeMaziNnamdiKanuNow
    0 Commentarios ·0 Acciones ·86 Views ·0 Vista previa
  • Breaking News!

    Yesterday, Davido once again proved why he’s truly The People’s King!

    As part of his Empowerment Scheme, the superstar gave out 2,000 CNG-powered tricycles (Keke) to support small-scale business owners and hardworking Nigerians across the country. 💪🏽

    This massive initiative is aimed at reducing unemployment and promoting clean energy transportation. Each tricycle is CNG-powered — eco-friendly, cost-efficient, and a smart step towards a greener Nigeria

    Davido isn’t just making music; he’s changing lives and empowering thousands of families.
    Breaking News! Yesterday, Davido once again proved why he’s truly The People’s King! 👑🔥 As part of his Empowerment Scheme, the superstar gave out 2,000 CNG-powered tricycles (Keke) to support small-scale business owners and hardworking Nigerians across the country. 🇳🇬💪🏽 This massive initiative is aimed at reducing unemployment and promoting clean energy transportation. Each tricycle is CNG-powered — eco-friendly, cost-efficient, and a smart step towards a greener Nigeria 🌍✨ Davido isn’t just making music; he’s changing lives and empowering thousands of families.
    0 Commentarios ·0 Acciones ·131 Views ·0 Vista previa
  • GUINEA-BISSAU : President UMARO SISSOKO EMBALÓ remains in power after the end of his term. He refused to hold presidential elections, dissolved parliament, expelled ECOWAS envoys, and was never sanctioned by ECOWAS nor the African Union African Union, because their master in the EUROPEAN UNION has never asked them to!

    But they were quick to suspend the likes of MALI , BURKINA FASO , NIGER REPUBLIC & MADAGASCAR for kicking the western puppets out of power in their countries. Shame!

    #ShareThisPost #followmypage #ECOWAS #AfricanUnion #puppets #Eu #usa #africa
    GUINEA-BISSAU 🇬🇼: President UMARO SISSOKO EMBALÓ remains in power after the end of his term. He refused to hold presidential elections, dissolved parliament, expelled ECOWAS envoys, and was never sanctioned by ECOWAS nor the African Union African Union, because their master in the EUROPEAN UNION has never asked them to! But they were quick to suspend the likes of MALI 🇲🇱, BURKINA FASO 🇧🇫, NIGER REPUBLIC 🇳🇪 & MADAGASCAR 🇲🇬 for kicking the western puppets out of power in their countries. Shame! #ShareThisPost #followmypage #ECOWAS #AfricanUnion #puppets #Eu #usa #africa
    0 Commentarios ·0 Acciones ·358 Views ·0 Vista previa
  • Abia's Economic Leap
    Governor Alex Otti just shared two massive updates showing how Abia State is partnering with the private sector to drive economic recovery and sustainability:

    1. Waste-to-Wealth Flag-Off Coming Soon!
    Abia is leveling up its sanitation program by launching a Waste-to-Wealth initiative.

    The Vision: Moving beyond waste disposal to proper treatment and recycling, turning rubbish into valuable resources like gas, methane, and power.

    The Strategy: The state has finalized partnership agreements with private entities to execute this complex, high-impact project, following successful models in Europe.

    2. Industrial Asset Revival
    The government is committed to acting as an "Enabler" to restart moribund industries for mass job creation.

    Acquisition Complete: The State has concluded plans to acquire Afro-Leverages (on the Aba-Port Harcourt Expressway) from AMCON. This follows the acquisition of Star Paper Mill.

    The PPP Model: The goal is NOT for the government to run the companies, but to acquire the assets and then partner with expert private management to operate them efficiently and create thousands of jobs for Abia youths.

    #AbiaPPP #AlexOtti #WasteToWealth #Industrialization #JobCreation
    📈 Abia's Economic Leap Governor Alex Otti just shared two massive updates showing how Abia State is partnering with the private sector to drive economic recovery and sustainability: 1. Waste-to-Wealth Flag-Off Coming Soon! ♻️ Abia is leveling up its sanitation program by launching a Waste-to-Wealth initiative. The Vision: Moving beyond waste disposal to proper treatment and recycling, turning rubbish into valuable resources like gas, methane, and power. The Strategy: The state has finalized partnership agreements with private entities to execute this complex, high-impact project, following successful models in Europe. 2. Industrial Asset Revival 🏭 The government is committed to acting as an "Enabler" to restart moribund industries for mass job creation. Acquisition Complete: The State has concluded plans to acquire Afro-Leverages (on the Aba-Port Harcourt Expressway) from AMCON. This follows the acquisition of Star Paper Mill. The PPP Model: The goal is NOT for the government to run the companies, but to acquire the assets and then partner with expert private management to operate them efficiently and create thousands of jobs for Abia youths. #AbiaPPP #AlexOtti #WasteToWealth #Industrialization #JobCreation
    0 Commentarios ·0 Acciones ·441 Views ·0 Vista previa
001Davido https://001davido.com